Hobart Welders
Home » Weld Talk
Weld Talk Message Boards - Powered by vBulletin

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Esab

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South carolina
    Posts
    388

    Esab

    I have never seen anyone mention esab on this forum. I am in the market for a 200-250 amp mig welder. Yeah, I know,I still have'nt got one. Is esab worth considering?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Austin TX
    Posts
    4,861
    Quote Originally Posted by Skipper
    I have never seen anyone mention esab on this forum
    Try doing a search for posts by the member "Brand X." You'll find plenty about Esab...
    Trailblazer 302 * Millermatic 212 * Syncrowave 180SD * X-Treme 12VS Feeder * Spoolmate 3035
    Thermal Dynamics Cutmaster 52 Plasma * Lincoln 175 MIG

    Victor Superrange II * Victor Journeyman

    Hobart HH 125EZ



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,341
    Quote Originally Posted by Zrexxer
    Try doing a search for posts by the member "Brand X." You'll find plenty about Esab...

    You might be able to google Dan pretty soon!!!!!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    northern NJ
    Posts
    98
    We had an ESAB mig, I think it was a 300. Bought it about 6 to 8 yrs ago. After a while it just got pushed into a corner & only used if no other choice. Everybody used the Miller 250 or the (25 yr old maybe) Miller 200. The ESAB always had trouble starting & just didn't work like the Millers. Just got rid of it a couple weeks ago after sitting for about 2 yrs without being used. I would never buy one.---MMW---
    MM250
    TB250g
    22A feeder
    Lincoln ac/dc 225
    Victor o/a
    Lincoln square wave 175

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    4,986
    My friend has a ESAB 250 that he has had for a long time, I use it all the time and while I prefer my MM210 his ESAB works just fine and over the years he has had no problem with it.
    Regards, George

    Hobart Handler 210 w/DP3035 - Great 240V small Mig
    Hobart Handler 140 - Great 120V Mig
    Hobart Handler EZ125 - IMO the best 120V Flux Core only machine

    Miller Dynasty 200DX with cooler of my design, works for me
    Miller Spectrum 375 - Nice Cutter

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,341
    Quote Originally Posted by MMW
    We had an ESAB mig, I think it was a 300. Bought it about 6 to 8 yrs ago. After a while it just got pushed into a corner & only used if no other choice. Everybody used the Miller 250 or the (25 yr old maybe) Miller 200. The ESAB always had trouble starting & just didn't work like the Millers. Just got rid of it a couple weeks ago after sitting for about 2 yrs without being used. I would never buy one.---MMW---
    That must of been this model?
    It's a inverter in the 250 case and was pretty hard to dial in.
    I traded my Migmaster 250 for one. It did not matter to me
    because I was selling mine anyway. I traded it to one of the
    top Airgas demo/sales tech guys. He wanted the Migmaster 250
    because it was easier to dial in then the 300. (L-TEC= same thing) This Airgas guy can
    flat out weld and has used every machine out. Here is one
    of his flux-core welds. He was the guy that help me get a handle
    on the 210 when I had a problem with .035 wire. I set up a 210
    with .030 wire and let him use it. He liked it but still prefers
    the esab over the 210. I ran the Esab 250 with .023 through .045 solid
    wire with many gases and you would be hard pressed to find
    any 250 mig that does it all as well. It runs 90/10 short-arc great
    because it is somewhat bitey (sharp) arc
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Brand X; 10-21-2005 at 11:46 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    999
    ESAB has a good 250 and dual purpose 260, Anything below 200amps in a mig is a waste of money though. The only quirk with the 250 is the cap bank loosening off, a bit of loctite on the screws stops this.

    ESAB also tends to use alot of silicon to protect live parts. This causes dust tracking and failture if the machines aren't cleaned out once in a while.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    northern NJ
    Posts
    98
    The esab we had was yellow & very similar to the Miller 250 in size & output but it just never worked as well. Just my opinion. It was not an inverter machine.---MMW---
    MM250
    TB250g
    22A feeder
    Lincoln ac/dc 225
    Victor o/a
    Lincoln square wave 175

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    north dakota
    Posts
    9

    esab 250+

    Have had an esab 250 plus for three years now. Pushed alot of .035 regular and .045 hard surface wire through her in that time and she has worked flawlessly. Not a speck of trouble. Arc quality and starts are exceptional. Have friends with miller 200, 251 and esab 360. Tried them and wouldn't even consider getting rid of it. Wasn't afraid of getting esab because local dealer sells miller, hobart, lincoln and esab and services them all. He recommended esab for reliability, durability and customer service. I am very happy I listened to his advice!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South carolina
    Posts
    388
    Well,

    Its esab migmaster 250, IM 210, mm210, or lincoln power mig 215. I just have to decide now. This deal is gonna go down in a few days. I have looked at everything, spool gun prices, the actual prices of the welders, the duty cycle and its not much difference in any of them except the opinions I have got from various folks on the forums. I would like the 250 amps of of penetration if needed and the only way I can get it for the money is either the esab or the lincoln. The lincoln's output from what I read can go up to 250 amps. The esab and the lincolns duty cycle at 215amps is 30 percent. Its a tough decision

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,341
    The esab duty-cycle is 250 amps at 50% (Migmaster 250)
    You must be looking at the import 253 Esab.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    539
    i tried both yellow and blue, both were good, but...the miller machine seemed a bit smoother. the arc started a little easier and seemed to be hot from the word go, where the esab i used took a split second of crackle to get rolling well.
    probably just my inexperienced hand, but hey- i don't do this for a living, i just want it to work when i squeeze the trigger without knowing exactly where every bell and whistle has to be set!
    i definitely prefer the yellow plasma cutter though...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Westchester county, N.Y.
    Posts
    2,177
    Hi, im Jesse James, and i like yellow.......
    ______________________________________
    Bakery Mechanic
    Licensed Electrician
    check out: www.mattesbydesign.com great for vinyl lettering
    "Why do i ask such difficult questions? 'Cause i know the answers to the easy one's!"
    *****Heineken*****
    -any questions or discussions on 'gout' are welcome-

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,341
    No he doesn't, he likes this god awful thing.
    Reminds me of his other work.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Aumsville, Oregon
    Posts
    5,208
    Lincoln's 250 amp rating on the PM 215 is going to be useless with solid wire. The unit doesn t output a high enough voltage to run a solid wire at that amperage level. A self shielded fluxcore is the only way the PM 215 would be any good at 250 amps. Honestly, on this unit I would consider the 250 amp rating total marketing hype. Don't you find it somewhat interesting that Lincoln doesn t provide info on the duty cycle at this 250 amp output? BTW, Miller's 210 is fully capable of outputting close to 250 amps too. Realistically though both units are best considered around 200 amp units. Based on the output #'s ( voltage and amperage), with a solid wire, the MM 210 is the more powerful unit. Also, don't draw in by the slight advertised difference in the duty cycles between the MM 210 and the PM 215. the 210's rating is conservative. If you ran the units side by side at the same output you'd probably discover the duty cycle rating is very similar.

    If top end power is one of your highest priorities, I don't think the MM 210 or the PM 215 are going to be competition for ESAB'S 253. The Max OCV on the 253 is around 42V if I remember right. Where as, the MM 210 and PM 215 are in the 34 to 35 volt range. To me this means the 253 is going to have more top end voltage available to play with, making it a more powerful 200+ amp solid wire unit in comparison to the other two units.

    OK, I just looked at the ESAB owners manual it shows 23V at 250 amp. The volt/ amp curve in the MM 210 owners manual shows 23+ V @250 amps. Info on the PM 215 that Lincoln provided me shows 21.2V @ 250 amps. So based strictly on #'s being supplied the 210 is the more powerful unit between the 3 . However, Miller doesn t rated the 210 for this output, and past dealings with Miller leads me to believe, if you wanted a 250 amp unit, they'd recommend the MM 251. Honestly though @ 200+ amps and around 25 V that my MM 210 is capable of outputting I can easily weld 1/2" material in multiple passes. Of course a 250 amp unit, with it high duty cyle would be better suited for the task if a large volume of work was required.

    I will say one definite advantage the 253 has over the other 2 units are 12 voltage taps instead of 7. If you ever want to do automotive sheet metal thicknesses, the 253 is advertised at 40 amps for it lowend, where as the 210 and 215 are advertised as 30 amps low end units. I know from experience, the the 210 is an excellent unit on this thin ga material.
    Last edited by Dan; 10-23-2005 at 01:40 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •